Macaque Monkey Photo: Copyright or Public Domain?
The Infamous Macaque Selfie With Its Toothy Grin
Wikipedia Versus David Slater
Briton David Slater is in dispute with Wikipedia over a photo they have published on the Wikimedia website. Wikipedia claims the image is in the public domain. David Slater disagrees with them and says he owns the copyright. He is a professional wildlife photographer and his main income is from selling photographs. The matter of who owns the copyright is thus vitally important to him.
The photograph (shown above) is a close-up of a macaque monkey. The grinning smile in the portrait has become an iconic image. It has been shared millions of times via social media, but Mr. Slater has made no money from its popularity.
In 2011, David was on location in Indonesia filming macaques. The monkeys are an endangered species and he planned to use the photos to raise awareness of their plight. He spent several days with them in the forest, but the “big money shot” eluded him. In order to get that special picture, he set the camera with a distance release switch. He moved out of sight of the animals and they were able to approach the camera unafraid. The monkeys were fascinated by their reflection in the lens and put their faces really close to it. The camera trigger was pulled and some incredible images were captured.
Monkey Selfie Starts Copyright Row 2011
Copyright is a form of protection provided by the laws of the United States to the authors of “original works of authorship,” including literary, dramatic, musical, artistic, and certain other intellectual works. This protection is available to both published and unpublished works.— United States Copyright Office
Can a Non-Human Take a Selfie?
The legal fight hinges on whether a selfie can only be taken by a human being or whether an animal can take one too. ‘Selfie’ is short for self-portrait. The person who takes the picture and the subject of the photo are one and the same and they hold the copyright. US copyright law refers only to the protection of artistic work created by people. Animals are not mentioned.
Wikipedia argues that even though the monkey cannot claim copyright, neither can David Slater as he did not take the shot. The camera shutter was triggered by a macaque monkey and so the monkey was the photographer. Their viewpoint is as follows. “This file is in the public domain, because as the work of a non-human animal, it has no human author in whom copyright is vested.”
Full Length Self Portrait Taken By Macaque Monkey
The term “public domain” refers to creative materials that are not protected by intellectual property laws such as copyright, trademark, or patent laws. The public owns these works, not an individual author or artist. Anyone can use a public domain work without obtaining permission, but no one can ever own it.— Stanford University Libraries website
PETA Gets Involved
The main fight about who owns the copyright has been wending its way through the US Courts for the last 6 years. In 2015 animal rights group PETA (People for the Ethical treatment of Animals) joined the fray on behalf of the macaque monkey.
They argued the selfie photos should not be classified as public domain as the copyright is owned by the monkey. They said profits from the sale of a book by David Slater containing the macaque’s self-portraits should be used to benefit the animal. The Court disagreed and ruled against PETA.
PETA have recently represented their case to the Appeal Court.
PETA Sues Over Monkey Selfies
Monkey Law Suit Reaches Federal Appeals Court
The case is still being heard as I write this, so this article will be updated when the Appeal Court’s judgement is known.
The facts so far:
At every stage of this process, the US lower Courts have determined that David Slater does not own the intellectual copyright to the macaque’s selfie photos. Each Court has ruled in favor of Wikipedia’s contention that the photos are public domain works and therefore freely available for anyone to use.
PETA is still trying to act as a “friend” to the monkey and argues that any monies should be used to protect this critically endangered species.
The UK has granted copyright of the pictures to David Slater and his company in Britain. However, without US copyright protection the photos are still being freely copied and shared online.
Mr. Slater continues to say that without his camera and equipment the monkeys could not have taken the photos. He insists he owns the worldwide copyright as he set up the tripod and the monkeys only played with the camera for a few moments. He says he has lost income due to this dispute. Because of widespread copying of the image he has suffered consequential loss of royalties.
Federal Appeals Court Hears Copyright Case July 2017
The critically endangered macaques have suffered as they’ve been hunted for their meat, taken as pets, and squeezed into ever smaller areas by illegal tree clearing for coconut plantations and villagers’ garden plots. Meanwhile conservationists are fighting government plans to open wild-lands to roads and industries.
Surveys from 2009 to 2010 put their numbers at about 2,000 in the reserve, … (but) their numbers have dropped since then. It’s not known how many live elsewhere in North Sulawesi.— The National Geographic magazine March 2017
The crested black macaque is the most endangered of the seven macaque monkey species found on the island of Sulawesi (formerly Celebes) in Indonesia. For more information about this monkey, Macaca nigra, and its critically endangered status take a look at the wildlife charity Arkive’s website.
To follow the arguments presented to the Appeal Court, the abc news website has live updates of progress of the case.